If Technology Is Effective in the Classroom – Why Do Some Students Dislike It So Much?

The effectiveness of technology use in the classroom has become a controversial issue. While many teachers and students feel that it’s best to use technology because it enhances teaching many others feel that it causes too many challenges and that it is a waste of time. If technology is as effective in the classroom as many teachers believe it to be; why do some students dislike it so much?

In order to objectively respond to this question, 3 articles were examined. 2 out of the 3 relate how the use of technology in the classroom frustrates students while the last one translates the thoughts of students who feel that technology in the classroom has responded to their need. So the issue is not that technology is not effective but rather that some teachers need to be mindful about technology use in the classroom and others need to be trained in order to properly use technology to teach so that students do not view technology as obstruction learning but as an enhancing tool.

After summarizing the 3 articles that have been reviewed we will be able to prove that there are 2 groups of students who claim to dislike technology in the classroom: Those who are improperly exposed to it by their teacher and those who did not give themselves enough time to familiarize themselves with it. We will then be able to get to the logical conclusion that those same students would appreciate the value of technology in the classroom if their teachers used it properly. Let us first summarize the articles that we are referring to.

The article “When good technology means bad teaching related that many students feel that teachers and professor use technology as a way to show off. Students complain of technology making their teachers “less effective than they would be if they stuck to a lecture at the chalkboard” (Young) other problems related by students include teachers wasting class time to teach about a web tool or to flab with a projector or software. When teachers are unfamiliar with the technological tools, they are likely to waist more time trying to use them the technological software that is used the most according to students is PowerPoint. Students complain that teachers use it instead of their lesson plan. Many students explain that it makes understanding more difficult “I call it PowerPoint abuse” (Young). Professors also post their PowerPoint Presentation to the school board before and after class and this encourages students to miss more classes.

Another problem reported in the article with the use of technology in the classrooms is that many schools spend time to train their staff about how to use a particular technology but it does not train them on “strategies to use them well” (Young). The writer believed that schools should also give small monetary incentives to teachers and professors to attend workshops.

In an interview made with 13 students, “some gave their teacher a failing when it came to using Power Point, Course Management systems and other classroom technology” (Young ) some of the complains were again about the misuse of PowerPoint’s and the fact that instructors use it to recite what’s on the scale. Another complaint was that teachers who are unfamiliar with technology often waste class time as they spend more time troubleshooting than teaching. The last complain mentioned is that some teachers require students to comment on online chat rooms weekly but that they do not monitor the outcome or never make reference to the discussion in class.

Similarly, the article “I’m not a computer person” (Lohnes 2013) speaks to the fact that students expectations as far as technology is concerned is very different. In a study done with 34 undergraduate university students, they advise that technology is an integral part of a university students life because they have to do must everything online from applying for college or university, searching and registering for classes, pay tuition and that in addition to being integrated in the administration, etc. technology is also widely used to teach and is valued by higher education.

Those students, however, feel that technology poses a barrier to success as they struggle to align with the ways in which the institution values technology.” A student explains that technology is used in her freshman year to turn in assignments, participate in discussion boards and blogs, emailing the professor, viewing grades and for a wide range of other administrative task including tracking the next school bus. This particular student whose name is Nichole says that she does not own a laptop but shares a family computer. She has a younger brother who also uses the computer to complete his school work so she consequently has to stay up late to complete assignments. She states “technology and I? We never had that connection” (Lohnes). Nichole dislikes the fact that her college requests that she had more contact with technology than she is conformable with. Nonetheless, she explains that as she started doing those school online assignments so frequently she came to realize that they were not that bad.

One of her issues though with technology is that she had come from Puerto Rico about a year prior entering college and that she never had to use the computer so much there. The articles relates that other college students like Nichole have admitted that they are “reluctant technology users” (Lohnes) The article wants to explain, in essence, that although most people would expect that college students prefer technology and are already familiar with it,” that assumption is faulty” (Lohnes).

On the other hand, the article “What Screenagers Say About… ” High school age students were asked about what they thought of technology but most expressed liking it. One of them said about PowerPoint: “My history teacher did a good job with Power Points. He would put them online, which made for really great reviews.” (Screneagers, 2011) Others expressed how technology was really who they are and that teachers should understand for example that when they text in class, they are not being rude but that they have gotten used to multi tasking. Another student invites teachers to not be afraid of technology “Teachers shouldn’t be afraid of technology. Understand that it’s how we live our lives. So don’t just push it out. Learn to cope with us and how we work.” (Screenagers, 2011)

Another student however, expressed how she prefers simpler technology that her teacher is comfortable with rather than high tech that the teacher does not manipulate well “The most important thing for teachers is to be comfortable with what they’re using. It doesn’t have to be super high tech. My math teacher used a projector, and it was one of my favorite classes. Then I would go to this other class where the teacher used Power Points and the SMART board, but I didn’t get any more out of it because she wasn’t comfortable with the technology” (Screenagers, 2011) Students spoke about their appreciation for virtually all types of technology used in the classroom. Another said “One of my teachers used Skype. That’s face-to-face interaction. If I had a problem with some math problem I was working on, I could take a picture of it and put it on the Skype screen. She could see where I was making my mistake. It really helped.” (Screenagers, 2011) The bottom line is that those high school students wanted to let teachers know that they really like technology and that it is already a great part of their daily routine but that it had to be used properly in order for them to enjoy it.

Similarly, they summarize a few things that they dislike as well. Among the list, they said: reading on the computer, paying a lot for an online textbook and the fact that they often forget everything else when they get caught up with using technology.

Nonetheless, they had much more positive things they liked in technology like for example that some teachers would text a question for them to think about before class, so if they do not know they answer, they would communicate with classmates to discuss the possibility for the answer before class. This allows them to go to class prepared. They also like using Skype, emailing their teachers instead of going to speak to them in person. They also enjoy discussion boards. The advice they would like to convey to their teachers is to make sure that they are comfortable with whatever technological tools they are using, to give them more freedom to use the good sites and those in the middle range when they are surfing the net using school computers and to understand that technology is part of their lives.

After summarizing those articles, we can see that the students mentioned in Youngs, 2004 dislike technology because their experience with it was not satisfactory. In other terms, a group of students dislike technology because some teachers are not mindful about technology use or they need additional training. For example, some students are frustrated because they feel that instructors waist their time when they are not properly trained to use the technological tools. Others disliked the fact that some teachers had PowerPoint presentations which were either not meaningful or they would just read whatever they wrote and add no additional comments. Those examples are called “bad teaching (Young, 2004) and they are in fact terrible examples that teachers should not follow because technology is not meant to help teachers do the least work or to adopt poor teaching practices. Somme students related that PowerPoint was widely used by teachers so they even call it PowerPoint abuse.

I can relate to what is being expressed by those students. I observed a Teaching Assistant teach a grammar class recently. He purchased a device to allow him to monitor the screen without touching the computer. He was able to walk throughout the class while changing slides. It all looked so impressive but despite all of this show, students were left so confused at the end of the lesson. When they asked questions, he went back to the slide that had the grammar rule and read it over to the class. The PowerPoint was a duplication of the textbook chapter. The same examples of the book were used. At the end of the course, he felt that he had done a great PowerPoint when in fact, it was not meaningful. It was a copy/paste project from the text book to the screen. This example shows that we need to use common sense when using technology. When teaching grammar, a teacher has to be able to come up with examples other than those in the book, you have to write on the board, have student practice what they have learned. PowerPoint use was a real bad idea, in my opinion, for teaching this course. It was just not the right technological tool for the lesson.

Students in that class may decide that they hate Power Points because it confuses them more while the issue is not with the use of PowerPoint but instead with the teacher’s poor choice of technology. The point I also want to make here is that teachers may sometimes be unaware of their improper use of technology. This is why, as educators, we sometimes need to ask students for their feedback so we may make corrections where needed.

We can then conclude that those students dislike technology as a result of improper technological use by teachers, and also because many teachers do not attend workshops or training sessions to help them obtain a broader knowledge of technology since they are so busy. Like suggest (Youngs, 2004) and (Lohnes, 2012), those same busy teachers would have attended those trainings if there were given an incentive. In the article “Technology Standards in a Third-Grade Classroom” (Kovalik, 2001), it is related how a study done on a 3rd grade class of 25 showed that students were properly using technology. There is no indication that those students dislike using technology. The article also mentioned how the teachers were highly trained because the Ohio board pays incentive to teachers to participate in technology training which teaching them not only how to use technology by teaches them strategies on when to use them.

Boards from other states should consider doing the same thing to ensure that their teachers are responding to the technological need of their students and that they are teaching them according to the standards. The Ohio school mentioned above met the standards as far as technology is concerned because of the technology coaching received by the teachers. If teachers learn how to properly use technology in the classroom, it will be a less frustrating experience for them and for the student who will less likely dislike technology since it will meet its purpose to enhance teaching.

The other groups of students who dislike technology are those who were not exposed to it for long enough. The College Freshman, Nichole advises that she was not exposed to so much technology while she was in high school in her home country; consequently, it seemed to be a burden to her to have to need a computer to complete most of her school assignments but also to interact with her classmate via a discussion board. What is interesting though is that even though she claimed to dislike technology so much, she advised that once she started to spend so much time using it, she realizes that it is not so bad. Even though it is likely that some people do not like the telephone and texting so much, the computer and some website have become part of most people daily routine. In Nichole’s case, she does not own a laptop and has to wait for her turn to use the family computer which means that she has no attachment to this media because her use of it is controlled. However, once she gets to own her own computer, it is a guaranteed that her view of technology will change.

I returned to school after about 12 years. When I was in college the 1st time around, nothing was electronic but when I contacted USF to apply, they told me that everything was online. At first, I asked why everything was online but once I got used to it, I started to understand the value of having the convenience to do a lot of things without having to live my home.

Therefore, Nichole will certainly not continue to dislike technology that much once she gets more familiar and more attached to it. The fact is that she stated that she started to realize that it was not that bad once she started doing so many assignments. She came to the conclusion that the computer was not yet a friend but that it was no longer an enemy; it became to her an acquaintance.

With this understanding, depending on the background of some ELL students and depending on whether or not they were exposed to technology in their home country, they may not like technology at first but this should not be a sign that they will never come to appreciated it. As teacher, we will need to allow them time to familiarize themselves with it while we continue to properly use it so that we do not advocate against it or involuntary send missed information about its true value.

On the other hand, the last article testifies to the fact that the new generation is technology driven and that when used properly, they benefits from it in the classroom, there are several examples of how teachers originally used technology to teach which are appreciated by students. What should the conclusion be then?

We have proven that technology use is effective in the classroom but that teachers need to take some actions in order to make this tool useful to students. It is necessary that they received some training if they lack it, and like a student suggested in the Screenager article, they should refrain from using complicated tools if they are not sure about how to use them. It’s best to properly use something much simpler that they are familiar with like a high school student suggested.

In addition, it is important for teachers to screen the countless technological tools and to research them before introducing them to their teaching. Should they test some that do not work well, they have to stop using them and seek one that is more appropriate. Most importantly, technology is not always the answer this is why teachers should be balanced when using it. If it is required that we use the board and chalks to help students better understand, this is what we should do. Doing so, we will ensure that more students appreciate the use of technology in the classroom for what it is worth.

Why Invest In Online Advertising?

There are so many reasons as to why you should consider investing in online advertising for your business that once you learn what they are, you will want to get in touch with a top notch marketing company that can cater to your specific needs. It would be a good idea to look into a team of experts that can provide marketing and IT consulting services at a more than affordable price. At this point, you might say that you can handle any business related tasks on your own as outsourcing them would cost you a lot of money.
The truth is that this is a myth. Before you can reach a conclusion in this case, you must gather enough information about the services that you can opt for, the advantages that they have to offer and the amount of resources you will need to spend in the process. Looking at it from the point of view of someone who knows a bit about every single aspect associated with a business’s online presence, you might be convinced that handling it all on your own will help you save a lot of money in the process.
However, when you actually start working on all of it you will realize that it is just too much work to be handled by just one individual. Opting for the professional assistance of a company that can help with IT consulting services as well as online advertising is definitely the right way to go. You can focus on managing your business while they handle everything else. One of the most important reasons why you should advertise your company online is the fact that this is the easiest way of getting people interested in your brand.
Even if they do not visit your website or order something in the near future, they will see the name and logo of your brand everywhere, fact which will contribute to them recognising it with just one look when they see it somewhere else. Let’s say that they stumble upon a well-placed ad online and do not pay too much attention to it. After that, they go on their favourite social media site and see a sponsored post that invites them to visit the page of your business, its website or give you a call.
This is one of the ways in which online advertising can help your business. There are many other advantages associated with this particular strategy, one of them being the fact that online ads are not that expensive. There is quite a difference between an online paid ad and one that you see on TV or even hear on the radio. Invest in digital marketing and IT consulting services today!
There are so many reasons as to why you should consider investing in online advertising for your business that once you learn what they are, you will want to get in touch with a top notch marketing company that can cater to your specific needs. It would be a good idea to look into a team of experts that can provide marketing and IT consulting services at a more than affordable price. At this point, you might say that you can handle any business related tasks on your own as outsourcing them would cost you a lot of money.
The truth is that this is a myth. Before you can reach a conclusion in this case, you must gather enough information about the services that you can opt for, the advantages that they have to offer and the amount of resources you will need to spend in the process. Looking at it from the point of view of someone who knows a bit about every single aspect associated with a business’s online presence, you might be convinced that handling it all on your own will help you save a lot of money in the process.
However, when you actually start working on all of it you will realize that it is just too much work to be handled by just one individual. Opting for the professional assistance of a company that can help with IT consulting services as well as online advertising is definitely the right way to go. You can focus on managing your business while they handle everything else. One of the most important reasons why you should advertise your company online is the fact that this is the easiest way of getting people interested in your brand.
Even if they do not visit your website or order something in the near future, they will see the name and logo of your brand everywhere, fact which will contribute to them recognising it with just one look when they see it somewhere else. Let’s say that they stumble upon a well-placed ad online and do not pay too much attention to it. After that, they go on their favourite social media site and see a sponsored post that invites them to visit the page of your business, its website or give you a call.
This is one of the ways in which online advertising can help your business. There are many other advantages associated with this particular strategy, one of them being the fact that online ads are not that expensive. There is quite a difference between an online paid ad and one that you see on TV or even hear on the radio. Invest in digital marketing and IT consulting services today!

Expert Overview Of Selenium Testing Course?

Selenium is not quite recently single device but rather is set of hardware which are utilized as a part of different situations. Lets comprehend about them.
Rundown: The product improvement area generally considers computerized testing to spare the bills of manual testing. In this post, experts will discuss Selenium robotization testing device and its points of interest.
Since the cost of testing is a basic factor for any product advancement extend, organizations have begun offering inclination to open source test computerization instruments as opposed to putting resources into costly business testing apparatuses. Without permitting costs, open source computerization testing devices offer focused components.
These elements are utilized by designers for robotizing the testing of programming applications and online interfaces. Designers can have a whole scope of open source computerization testing apparatuses for a wide range of testing like practical, UAT, Web and execution. Selenium is a free mechanized testing suite and not a solitary instrument.
Each apparatus of the Selenium caters particular testing needs of an organization.
There are four segments in Selenium :
1. Selenium IDE : Selenium IDE is the least complex system in the suite of Selenium and is most straightforward one to learn. It goes about as a Firefox module that software engineers can undoubtedly introduce like another module. Since it is the most straightforward system, it is utilized as a prototyping device. In the event that software engineers need to make more propelled test cases, they can either utilize Selenium RC or Web Driver.
2. Selenium RC : Selenium Remote Control (RC) was the primary mechanized web testing apparatus that let clients apply a programming dialect of their decision. It underpins the accompanying programming dialects Java PHP Python Perl C# Ruby
3. Selenium Grid : Selenium Grid is a server that enables tests to utilize web program cases running on remote machines. With Selenium Grid, one server goes about as the center point. Tests contact the center point to acquire access to program cases. The center point has a rundown of servers that give access to program examples (WebDriver hubs), and gives tests a chance to utilize these occasions. Selenium Grid permits running tests in parallel on numerous machines, and to oversee distinctive program renditions and program setups midway (rather than in every individual test). The capacity to run tests on remote program occurrences is valuable to spread the heap of testing over a few machines, and to run tests in programs running on various stages or working frameworks. The last is especially helpful in situations where not all programs to be utilized for testing can keep running on a similar stage.
4. Web Driver: The Web Driver has demonstrated itself a superior decision than both Selenium IDE and Selenium RC in a few viewpoints. It includes more present day and stable approach in computerizing the program’s activity. It doesn’t rely upon JavaScript for mechanization. Actually, the Web Driver manages the program by specifically interfacing with it. It bolsters programming dialects that are upheld by Selenium RC.
Do you know the people who added to the Selenium Project? At first, Selenium was created by Jason Huggins in 2004. While functioning as a specialist on a web application, he understood the continuous testing necessity.
Since the manual testing was getting to be noticeably wasteful, he built up a JS program “JavaScriptTestRunner” that would consequently control the activities of the program. Discovering this thought supportive to computerize different applications, he made JavaScriptRunner Opensource which was later known as Selenium Core.
Who made significant Selenium apparatuses? Give us a chance to discover Selenium RC or Remote Control device Analyzers utilizing Selenium Core needed to introduce the whole application for testing because of the confinements committed by the inception strategy.
The approach disavows JavaScript Code from getting to components from a space that change from its propelled range. The approach just let randomScript.JS to get to pages inside google.com. It can’t get to pages from different destinations as they are gotten from various spaces.
This framework was at first named as Hosted QA by him and it could catch screenshots of the program in basic stages, and at the same time convey Selenium charges to unmistakable machines. Selenium IDE instrument Selenium IDE was produced by Shinya Kasatani as a Firefox augmentation, which is utilized for computerizing the program by means of an uncommon component of record-and-playback.
He got the possibility of Selenium IDE to upgrade the speed in making experiments. WebDriver device WebDriver was the main cross-stage testing system made by Simon Stewart to control the program from the OS level. Noteworthiness of Selenium Selenium Automation Testing is the best alternative for current days robotized testing. It is increasing more importance and the greater part of the analyzers and organizations incline toward it for mechanizing the

What Is the Relevance of Technology?

“Technology in the long-run is irrelevant”. That is what a customer of mine told me when I made a presentation to him about a new product. I had been talking about the product’s features and benefits and listed “state-of-the-art technology” or something to that effect, as one of them. That is when he made his statement. I realized later that he was correct, at least within the context of how I used “Technology” in my presentation. But I began thinking about whether he could be right in other contexts as well.

What is Technology?

Merriam-Webster defines it as:

1

a: the practical application of knowledge especially in a particular area: engineering 2

b: a capability given by the practical application of knowledge

2

: a manner of accomplishing a task especially using technical processes, methods, or knowledge

3

: the specialized aspects of a particular field of endeavor

Wikipedia defines it as:

Technology (from Greek τέχνη, techne, “art, skill, cunning of hand”; and -λογία, -logia[1]) is the making, modification, usage, and knowledge of tools, machines, techniques, crafts, systems, and methods of organization, in order to solve a problem, improve a preexisting solution to a problem, achieve a goal, handle an applied input/output relation or perform a specific function. It can also refer to the collection of such tools, including machinery, modifications, arrangements and procedures. Technologies significantly affect human as well as other animal species’ ability to control and adapt to their natural environments. The term can either be applied generally or to specific areas: examples include construction technology, medical technology, and information technology.

Both definitions revolve around the same thing – application and usage.

Technology is an enabler

Many people mistakenly believe it is technology which drives innovation. Yet from the definitions above, that is clearly not the case. It is opportunity which defines innovation and technology which enables innovation. Think of the classic “Build a better mousetrap” example taught in most business schools. You might have the technology to build a better mousetrap, but if you have no mice or the old mousetrap works well, there is no opportunity and then the technology to build a better one becomes irrelevant. On the other hand, if you are overrun with mice then the opportunity exists to innovate a product using your technology.

Another example, one with which I am intimately familiar, are consumer electronics startup companies. I’ve been associated with both those that succeeded and those that failed. Each possessed unique leading edge technologies. The difference was opportunity. Those that failed could not find the opportunity to develop a meaningful innovation using their technology. In fact to survive, these companies had to morph oftentimes into something totally different and if they were lucky they could take advantage of derivatives of their original technology. More often than not, the original technology wound up in the scrap heap. Technology, thus, is an enabler whose ultimate value proposition is to make improvements to our lives. In order to be relevant, it needs to be used to create innovations that are driven by opportunity.

Technology as a competitive advantage?

Many companies list a technology as one of their competitive advantages. Is this valid? In some cases yes, but In most cases no.

Technology develops along two paths – an evolutionary path and a revolutionary path.

A revolutionary technology is one which enables new industries or enables solutions to problems that were previously not possible. Semiconductor technology is a good example. Not only did it spawn new industries and products, but it spawned other revolutionary technologies – transistor technology, integrated circuit technology, microprocessor technology. All which provide many of the products and services we consume today. But is semiconductor technology a competitive advantage? Looking at the number of semiconductor companies that exist today (with new ones forming every day), I’d say not. How about microprocessor technology? Again, no. Lots of microprocessor companies out there. How about quad core microprocessor technology? Not as many companies, but you have Intel, AMD, ARM, and a host of companies building custom quad core processors (Apple, Samsung, Qualcomm, etc). So again, not much of a competitive advantage. Competition from competing technologies and easy access to IP mitigates the perceived competitive advantage of any particular technology. Android vs iOS is a good example of how this works. Both operating systems are derivatives of UNIX. Apple used their technology to introduce iOS and gained an early market advantage. However, Google, utilizing their variant of Unix (a competing technology), caught up relatively quickly. The reasons for this lie not in the underlying technology, but in how the products made possible by those technologies were brought to market (free vs. walled garden, etc.) and the differences in the strategic visions of each company.

Evolutionary technology is one which incrementally builds upon the base revolutionary technology. But by it’s very nature, the incremental change is easier for a competitor to match or leapfrog. Take for example wireless cellphone technology. Company V introduced 4G products prior to Company A and while it may have had a short term advantage, as soon as Company A introduced their 4G products, the advantage due to technology disappeared. The consumer went back to choosing Company A or Company V based on price, service, coverage, whatever, but not based on technology. Thus technology might have been relevant in the short term, but in the long term, became irrelevant.

In today’s world, technologies tend to quickly become commoditized, and within any particular technology lies the seeds of its own death.

Technology’s Relevance

This article was written from the prospective of an end customer. From a developer/designer standpoint things get murkier. The further one is removed from the technology, the less relevant it becomes. To a developer, the technology can look like a product. An enabling product, but a product nonetheless, and thus it is highly relevant. Bose uses a proprietary signal processing technology to enable products that meet a set of market requirements and thus the technology and what it enables is relevant to them. Their customers are more concerned with how it sounds, what’s the price, what’s the quality, etc., and not so much with how it is achieved, thus the technology used is much less relevant to them.

Recently, I was involved in a discussion on Google+ about the new Motorola X phone. A lot of the people on those posts slammed the phone for various reasons – price, locked boot loader, etc. There were also plenty of knocks on the fact that it didn’t have a quad-core processor like the S4 or HTC One which were priced similarly. What they failed to grasp is that whether the manufacturer used 1, 2, 4, or 8 cores in the end makes no difference as long as the phone can deliver a competitive (or even best of class) feature set, functionality, price, and user experience. The iPhone is one of the most successful phones ever produced, and yet it runs on a dual-core processor. It still delivers one of the best user experiences on the market. The features that are enabled by the technology are what are relevant to the consumer, not the technology itself.

The relevance of technology therefore, is as an enabler, not as a product feature or a competitive advantage, or any myriad of other things – an enabler. Looking at the Android operating system, it is an impressive piece of software technology, and yet Google gives it away. Why? Because standalone, it does nothing for Google. Giving it away allows other companies to use their expertise to build products and services which then act as enablers for Google’s products and services. To Google, that’s where the real value is.

The possession of or access to a technology is only important for what it enables you to do – create innovations which solve problems. That is the real relevance of technology.

Download Upload Speed

While testing site of internet broadband connection, most of testing websites shows results for the upload speed, download & ping rate. Usually upload speed is always less than the download speed of same internet connection. This is a technical configuration, set by the Internet service provider ” this configuration is not dependent on the speed of your internet connection.

Then what is the difference in Download upload speed !

Simply downloading speed is the data transfer speed/rate at which data is downloaded from the Internet to the user’s device or computer. The uploading speed is the transfer rate at which data is uploaded from the user’s computer/device to the Internet. ISP companies set the default setting so to make download faster than the upload speed. The reason is that most of internet users have more of a need to download information. It gives the user the fast download access to download movies, songs, and a large number of documents quickly.

Although there may be some of larger businesses, which need faster uploading speed, but their ratio is not too lower than the customers demanding higher upload speed. Typically, data uploaded is going to a specific site, not to the general Internet or to multiple sites. Even in these cases, it is usually a rare task to perform. The meaning of term symmetrical is that the download and upload speeds are the same. Both speeds are optimally tested when they are symmetrical, but again, this is a rare configuration.

When performing the download portion of a speed test, many sites use Flash to transport their data to the user’s computer. This is an added obstacle to collecting the correct information. Bandwidth Place does not use Flash and has opted to use HTML 5 instead, allowing for a faster, cleaner test rate. During the download process, the server sends packets of binary files to the computer. Some companies that use Flash will not count up to 30% of the slowest packets transferred, stating that it makes up for the amount of time no packets are delivered during the ramp-up process (getting Flash prepared to run). The upload process is similar, grabbing generic bits of data from the user’s computer and transferring it to the server. This data is broken and is not complete information, so the data retrieved is safe.
If you are looking for your desired upload / download speed in Punjab, India. you may visit www.connectbroadbandservice.in for quotations.

The download speed is the maximum capacity of data transfer by which you can pull data from the server to your device. Most of broadband connections are designed to download much faster than they upload, since the majority of online activity, like loading web pages or streaming videos, consists of downloads. Download speed is measured in Mega bits per second (Mbps). The upload speed is how fast you send data from you to others. Uploading is necessary for sending big files via email, or in using video-chat to talk to someone else online (since you have to send your digital data to them). Upload speed is also measured in Mega bits per second (Mbps). When you save any kind of digital data / information from the internet to your computer / device, it is called downloading and the time taken or how fast it completes this task is called download speed. Usually, measured in Kbps (Kilo bits per second) or Mbps (Mega bits per second). Similarly, when you upload any kind of file on the internet or server e.g. – picture/video its called upload and the speed is upload speed. You can check the upload/download speed for your service provider at SpeedTest.net for free.